ABSTRACT
Purpose of Study The COVID-19 pandemic has presented a major challenge to the global medical community resulting in many necessary changes in worldwide research publication trends. As focus and funding of research have shifted throughout the pandemic, so too have publication types, topics, and country-wide research output. While changes during the pandemic have undoubtedly had an impact on publications, these impacts and their implication for long-term research have been poorly characterized. We aim to illustrate these shifting changes in publications during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods Used Publications were accessed using PubMed Advanced Search Criteria. The beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic was set as the date of the first reported case in Wuhan on 12/31/2019. Searches were conducted on 9/10/ 2021. We generated searches based on type of publication, country affiliation of the first author, date ranges, and specific topics such as 'COPD' or 'Diabetes'. We analyzed the changes in publications during the 4 months before the first case of COVID-19 and every 4 months thereafter. Results were analyzed using SPSS. Summary of Results In the two years before the pandemic, 3541.9 PubMed-indexed articles were published per day, while 4379.9 such articles have been published each day during the pandemic. Covid-19 resulted in net increases relative to baseline in case reports, reviews, and retracted publications with net decreases in clinical trials, multicenter studies, and randomized control trials in most yearly tertiles relative to the 4 months before Covid-19. Meta-analysis and observational studies demonstrated initial net increases followed by subsequent net decreases. The largest percent decrease in publication type relative to baseline has been seen in Phase I (- 82.6%) and Phase IV (-80.5%) clinical trials. In the first yearly tertile, China had the largest percent increase in publications relative to baseline (38.4%) followed by Italy in the second tertile (32.0%) and India in the third tertile (43.5%). Increases in daily publications were seen in many research topics including diabetes (32.8/day), asthma (4.6/day), heart disease (2.9/day), and COPD (2.4/day). Conclusions COVID-19 has caused a shift in research focus and funds towards pandemic-related research. This has emphasized lower evidence research, such as case reports, and shifted focus away from high evidence studies, such as clinical trials and meta-analysis. Production of high-evidence studies does not appear to be recovering as the pandemic continues. Research output of individual countries appears to coincide with COVID-19 related infection surges in each respective country. Despite new emphasis on Covid-related research, many important topics such as diabetes and heart disease have experienced increases in publications.
ABSTRACT
Purpose of Study Myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME), also called chronic fatigue syndrome, is a condition characterized by severe fatigue that impairs a patient's ability to perform common daily activities. Criteria for ME include 6 months of fatigue-limited daily activities, unrefreshing sleep, and symptom exacerbation following physical or mental strain, and orthostatic intolerance. New reports indicate that ME incidence may be higher in specific patient populations. This study was designed to investigate the association between ME and Cardiovascular disease in patients recovering from COVID-19 infection. Methods Used The patient population used for this study includes 19 patients that were referred to the Amarillo Heart Group in Amarillo, TX who also tested positive for Covid-19 at least 6 months prior to September 1, 2021. The patients that fit this timeline were asked a series of standardized questions and rate the severity of their symptoms on a scale of 0 to 5, with 0 being the absence of symptoms and 5 being the most severe. Two sets of questions were created and named Life Spheres Criteria (4 questions) and Symptoms Criteria (3 questions) based on the 2015 IOM Diagnostic Criteria for CFS. Rating more than 1 Life Spheres question as a 3 or higher or rating all 3 Symptoms Criteria questions as a 3 or higher indicated Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Information from the survey, including time since infection, demographics, and question scores, were analyzed. Summary of Results Our study included 10 women and 10 men, with the average amount of time since Covid-19 infection being 328.17 ± 41.36 days. Worsening of symptoms with mild exertion was the most commonly endorsed criteria (3.58 ± 1.64) and the least common criterion was fatigue reducing activity in school (2.00 ± 1.94). Women scored higher in every category except reduced activity in school when compared to men. However, there was no significant difference in symptom scores between the two groups with the Combined Fatigue Score being 2.89 ± 1.47 for women and 2.67 ± 1.59 for men. Nearly all symptom scores significantly positively correlated with one another, meaning if one category was high it was likely for other categories to be high as well. Ultimately, when looking at the Cumulative Pearson Correlation Scores, reduced social life, difficulty concentrating, and symptoms worsening with mild exertion were found to be most predictive of a high Combined Fatigue Score. Conclusions In this case series, over 80% of patients met the criteria for Post-COVID Myalgic Encephalomyelitis. While the link between ME and both COVID-19 and cardiovascular disease has been established, little is known about the severity of ME in patients who have a history of both cardiovascular disease and COVID-19 infection. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine ME in patients with both of these predisposing conditions. A high degree of clinical suspicion for ME should be used when screening and treating cardiac patients who have been infected with COVID-19.